루이지애나, 대법원 투표권법 판결이 현재 선거구도로 예비선거를 진행할 수 없다고 주장 – 실시간

Louisiana claims supreme court voting rights decision means it cannot carry out primaries with current electoral maps – live

The Guardian · 🇬🇧 London, GB Fran Lawther EN 2026-04-30 23:59 Translated
주지사와 법무장관이 대법원 판결 하루 뒤 2026년 중간선거 예비선거 연기를 추진
루이지애나는 목요일 5월 예비선거 연기를 신청했으며, 이는 다른 남부 주들도 수요일 투표권법을 심각하게 약화시킨 대법원 판결에 대응하여 선거구를 다시 그으려고 분주해하는 상황에서 나온 결정이다.

대법원 판결 이전, 선거구도 작성 시 인종 차별에 대한 주요 보호를 제거하기 전에 일부 주들은 이미 선거구를 다시 그으려는 절차를 시작했다. 이제 더 많은 주들이 이를 따랐으며, 주지사들은 11월 중간선거 이전에 선거구를 다시 그으려는 특별 회기를 소집할 것을 촉구하고 있다.

공화당인 루이지애나 주지사 제프 랜드리와 법무장관 리즈 뮤릴은 대법원 판결 이후 현재 선거구를 사용하여 예비선거를 진행할 수 없다는 공동 성명을 발표했다. 조기 투표는 5월 16일 예비선거를 앞두고 토요일에 시작될 예정이었다.

"주(State)는 현재 지도에 따라 하원 선거를 진행할 수 없도록 제지당하고 있습니다"라고 랜드리와 뮤릴은 목요일 소셜 미디어 성명에서 말했다. "우리는 입법부와 국무장관실과 함께 나아갈 방법을 개발하기 위해 노력하고 있습니다."

수요일에 미국 대법원은 루이지애나가 선거구도를 다시 그어야 한다고 판결했으며, 이는 1965년 투표권법의 주요 조항을 사실상 무효화하는 획기적인 결정이다.

보수 성향의 사무엘 알리토 대법관이 다수 의견을 작성하여 6대 3의 정당파 결정을 내렸으며, 대법원은 투표권법 제2조를 무효화했다. 제2조는 오랫동안 재분배 과정에서 소수 유권자들이 공정하게 대우받도록 보장하는 데 사용되어 왔다.

"인종을 정부 의사결정에 어떤 식으로든 포함시키는 것은 거의 다른 모든 맥락에서 적용되는 헌법적 규칙에서 벗어난 것을 의미합니다"라고 알리토 대법관은 다수 의견에서 썼다. "따라서 제2조 준수는 여기서 주의 인종 기반 재분배를 정당화할 수 없습니다. 중간 지구법원의 판결을 충족하려는 주의 시도는 이해할 수 있지만 위헌적 인종 부정행위입니다."

대법원의 판결은 미국 시민권 법에 있어 주요한 대변동이며 입법자들에게 흑인과 기타 소수 유권자들의 영향력을 약화시키는 선거구도 계획을 그릴 수 있는 허가를 준다.
처리 완료 3,185 tokens · $0.0077
기사 수집 완료 · 00:10
매체 피드에서 기사 메타데이터 수집
헤드라인 번역 완료 · 00:25
제목/요약 한국어 번역 (fetch 시점 inline)
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 598 tokens $0.00169 4.6s
본문 추출 완료
4,274자 추출 완료
본문 한국어 번역 완료 · 00:25
1,027자 번역 완료
claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 2,587 tokens $0.00597 12.7s
지정학적 엔티티 추출 완료 · 00:25
2개 엔티티 추출 완료

State’s governor and attorney general move to postpone midterm 2026 primaries just a day after supreme court ruling guts Voting Rights ActHere’s more of that statement from Louisiana attorney general Liz Murrill and Republican governor Jeff Landry:Yesterday’s historic Supreme Court victory for Louisiana has an immediate consequence for the State. The Supreme Court previously stayed an injunction against the State’s enforcement of the current Congressional map. By the Court’s order, however, that stay automatically terminated with yesterday’s decision. Accordingly, the State is currently enjoined from carrying out congressional elections under the current map. We are working together with the Legislature and the Secretary of State’s office to develop a path forward.

Louisiana moved to postpone its May primaries on Thursday in a move that came as other southern states are also scrambling to redraw congressional districts in response to the supreme court’s Wednesday ruling that severely weakened the landmark Voting Rights Act.

Before the supreme court’s decision, eliminating a key protection against racial discrimination in drawing voting maps, some states had already begun initiating processes to redraw districts and gut Black voting power. More states have now followed, with governors calling for special sessions to redraw congressional districts, potentially before the midterm elections in November.

Louisiana governor Jeff Landry and attorney general Liz Murrill, both Republicans, said in a joint statement that the state can no longer use its current districts to carry out the primaries after the supreme court ruling. Early voting had been scheduled to begin Saturday in advance of the 16 May primary.

“The State is currently enjoined from carrying out congressional elections under the current map,” Landry and Murrill said in the statement on social media Thursday. “We are working together with the Legislature and the Secretary of State’s office to develop a path forward.”

On Wednesday, the US supreme court ruled that Louisiana will have to redraw its congressional map, in a landmark decision that effectively guts a major section of the Voting Rights Act.

In a 6-3 decision along partisan lines, the court rendered ineffective section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the last remaining powerful provision of the 1965 civil rights law that prevents racial discrimination in voting. Section 2 has long been used to ensure minority voters are treated fairly in redistricting.

“Allowing race to play any part in government decision-making represents a departure from the constitutional rule that applies in almost every other context,” Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative, wrote for the majority opinion. “Compliance with section 2 thus could not justify the state’s use of race-based redistricting here. The state’s attempt to satisfy the middle district’s ruling, although understandable, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.”

The court’s decision is a major upheaval in US civil rights law and gives lawmakers permission to draw districting plans that weaken the influence of Black and other minority voters.

Here’s more of that statement from Louisiana attorney general Liz Murrill and Republican governor Jeff Landry:

double quotation markYesterday’s historic Supreme Court victory for Louisiana has an immediate consequence for the State. The Supreme Court previously stayed an injunction against the State’s enforcement of the current Congressional map. By the Court’s order, however, that stay automatically terminated with yesterday’s decision. Accordingly, the State is currently enjoined from carrying out congressional elections under the current map. We are working together with the Legislature and the Secretary of State’s office to develop a path forward.

Louisiana moved to postpone its May primaries on Thursday in a move that came as other southern states are also scrambling to redraw congressional districts in response to the supreme court’s Wednesday ruling that severely weakened the landmark Voting Rights Act.

Before the supreme court’s decision, eliminating a key protection against racial discrimination in drawing voting maps, some states had already begun initiating processes to redraw districts and gut Black voting power. More states have now followed, with governors calling for special sessions to redraw congressional districts, potentially before the midterm elections in November.

Louisiana governor Jeff Landry and attorney general Liz Murrill, both Republicans, said in a joint statement that the state can no longer use its current districts to carry out the primaries after the supreme court ruling. Early voting had been scheduled to begin Saturday in advance of the 16 May primary.

“The State is currently enjoined from carrying out congressional elections under the current map,” Landry and Murrill said in the statement on social media Thursday. “We are working together with the Legislature and the Secretary of State’s office to develop a path forward.”