펜타곤, 해군 장관 해임. $170억 트럼프급 전함은 어떻게 되나?

US Navy Secretary John Phelan was sacked Wednesday reoportedly amid disputes with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth over the expensive new Trump-class warships; Hegseth reportedly favours mass-produced...

Pete Hegseth swung his axe Wednesday and another head rolled. This time, US Navy Secretary John Phelan. Removed from office 'effective immediately', Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said on X. No further details were provided.

Sources would only tell Politico it was in part over a new and "hugely expensive" class of warships the Defence Secretary and his deputy, Stephen Feinberg, just didn't want, preferring instead to pivot to mass-produced sea attack drones.

But Phelan, a civilian appointment endorsed by Donald Trump, kept pushing the 'Golden Fleet' vision that would have the lead warship in this proposed new class as its command hub, and would have cost billions to even start development.

And the class name? That's potentially the best part of this story - Trump.

Two people familiar with developments told Politico the name was conceived "to curry favour with the president". But Hegseth, was not impressed. The plans are "not at all aligned with where Hegseth and Feinberg want to go", one source told Politico.

This was despite Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio flanking the president when he announced plans for the 'Golden Fleet' and his Trump-class vessels; "They'll be the fastest, the biggest and by far, 100 times more powerful than any battleship ever built…" the president had said at his Mar-a-Lago residence in Florida in December 2025.

Trump unveils plans for a new battleship class, named after himself.

And so the axe has swung and Phelan - a billionaire who helped finance Trump's presidential campaign - was in the White House when told the news. No formal statement has come from the US government, so far.

Plot twist: Budget sails on

The ships aren't gone, though. Not yet, anyway.

The Navy presented a $377.5 billion budget for FY27, part of a staggering $1.5 trillion ask from the Pentagon. At the centre of it are plans for a 'next-generation battleship' - the Trump-class - to restore American dominance of the high seas.

This was pitched as a critical given China's increased naval focus.

Image generated by AI

Not much, perhaps, should be read into the Navy presenting the Trump-class project in its budget; these plans were already part of documents prepared for the April 21 submission.

Phelan was sacked April 22.

But why push something the Pentagon's boss suddenly did not want?

Were the Trump-class warship plans simply a muscle flex for the world - a sign the US is pushing the boundaries of naval warfare, even as they are challenged by the Chinese and, now, Iran?

Or was retaining them in the budget a strategic move - Hegseth hedging his bets in anticipation of an irate Trump when he finds plans for futuristic warships in his name have been junked?

Or is there to the Phelan sacking than is evident at this time?

Advantage, China?

Either way, the US has a problem.

Beijing has already transitioned from a largely coastal defence-only force to a deep-water fleet that is, by hull count alone, believed to be the largest in the world. In simple terms, the Chinese have warships, lots of them.

They also have three aircraft carriers and plans to build a fourth.

The war in Iran - specifically Tehran's squeezing of the Strait of Hormuz - has underscored the world's dependence on seaborne energy supply lines and maritime chokepoints, and how these likely become future targets.

Image generated by AI

Washington's move to guarantee itself surveillance rights over the Malacca and Caribbean shipping passages, as well as pushing to have its authority over Hormuz recognised, suggests Trump knows this too.

Malacca Gambit: How China Oil-Choke Strategy Could Backfire On Trump

To establish and maintain naval superiority at these chokepoints, and have assets in reserve, the US needs boats on the water. And it doesn't have them, at least not as many as China.

Multiple reports indicate Beijing has between 350 and 840 ships of varying sizes and battle purposes. The US has only 290 to 465, though these are significantly more advanced. The US also has an advantage in firepower and fleet capabilities.

The $17B, 35,000+ ton gamble

Phelan's proposed ships are 880 feet-long 35,000+ ton guided missile battleships armed with Tomahawks, a full electronic warfare suite, and a flight deck with an enclosed hangar.

The size puts them on par with the Navy's amphibious assault ships - the USS Boxer and USS Tripoli, for example - deployed in the Iran war, and which can double as aircraft carriers.

Image generated by AI

They would also have futuristic hypersonic, nuclear, and directed-energy weapons; think railguns, electricity-powered weapons that fire metal slugs at hypersonic speeds.

Unconfirmed reports indicate the lead ship in the class - USS Defiant - could cost as much as $17 billion, with others priced at US9-15 billion each. The overall cost - $43.5 billion for the first three, with total hull count expected to settle at 10.

Phelan was No 4, the fourth senior Pentagon leader sacked in April.

John Phelan (File).

Not great advertisement, Trump's critics argue, for a government and military claiming to have 'crushed' the Iranians and won a great victory over the Strait of Hormuz, which remains shut.

The sacking follows a hat-trick of firings on April 1-2 - three senior generals, including Army Chief of Staff General Randy George; General David Hodne, Commander, Army Training and Doctrine Command/Transformation; and Major General William Green Jr, the Army Chief of Chaplains.

The firings (and forced resignations) haven't had an impact on the war in Iran, at least not publicly, but they have hit troop morale, multiple US media reports have said, and raised broader questions about need for military leadership re-alignment in war time.

Today marks a year since India suspended the treaty after the Pahalgam massacre. Those urging its revival today must remember the extent of what India had to absorb to keep it alive in the first place.

As Iran blocks the Strait of Hormuz, a channel that supplies 20 per cent of global oil and gas, Asian refiners race to reroute US Gulf crude through the Panama Canal while paying historic premiums to pass.

America's own Secretary of State has now publicly conceded that its most powerful financial weapon may be obsolete within five years.

Iran's ability to throttle tanker traffic through the Hormuz acts as a strategic, nuclear-like weapon without physical destruction, and the US must find a way around this particular challenge.

A section of the IRGC is firmly opposed to any negotiations and wants the key negotiator, Ghalibaf, gone. Here's why

The US-Israel war on Iran has taught Tehran a valuable lesson - it may not have a nuclear weapon, but it controls the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil and gas shipping route that gives it strategic leverage akin to a nuclear deterrent.

The most challenging question on this anniversary is what might happen if another Pahalgam-scale attack were to occur today. New Delhi finds itself in a strategic pincer.

US Vice President JD Vance - the 'good cop' to President Donald Trump's 'bad cop' - faces a 24 hour deadline in Pakistan as the Iran war ceasefire lapses April 22 but talks remain uncertain after US ship seizure.

When all else fails, Trump might very well throw his Vice President, JD Vance, under the bus. Remember what happened to Mike Pence?

Before US and Israeli strikes in June 2025, the International Atomic Energy Agency estimated that Iran possessed roughly 441 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, alongside approximately 200 kilograms enriched to 20 per cent.